A lot of workshops give writers micro-advice, but there’s a
larger issue that hasn’t been addressed. Even if you fix a passage or sentence
or beginning, you’re not taking care of what needs to be done. Punching up
dialogue or adding a new scene gives you a good feeling, but it’s often
cosmetic. Making those changes just makes your story marginally better.
Think of your work in a different way.
How did you lose that energy anyway? How do we let our books
get that way?
"The middle is everything."
Meg thinks it’s often a foundational problem when you have a
mushy middle.
All books start off with a grandiose fantasy. You know it’s
good because it’s something preoccupies you. You want to write about it. You
take it and start to push the story through an invisible funnel and you realize
you can’t do everything and you have to make some choices. This is a moment
when you getting serious about your novel. You can write about 80 pages of a book (without outlining), not worry about
where it is, who’s going read it, if someone someone will buy it, etc. Once you have, print it, read
it, and find out not what you hoped to do but what you really did.
If the writing is weak in a certain area it might be because
the ideas in that section aren’t strong. Maybe it’s because you didn’t know
what you wanted to express in that section.
Meg thinks flashbacks are a made up concept. In real life, we are always
toggling back and forth from past to future and now. You don’t have a character stop and remember something. It
should be fluid.
Ask yourself:
- Is the voice strong?
- Are you being faithful to a thought process that isn’t working? (why the 80 page rule works) -you can use ideas that don’t work
- Did you get off on the wrong track tone wise?
Revision is the greatest tool in the writer’s arsenal.
No comments:
Post a Comment